Resurrection of Jesus Christ: Four Views, One Truth

Resurrection of Jesus Christ: Four Views, One Truth [B. Lee Ligon-Borden, Ph.D.] on dev3.backoffice.snapp.ir *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This is a very capable.
Table of contents

Paul claimed to have an encounter with the resurrected Christ that was completely separate from the experiences of the other apostles. Based on this encounter, the entire direction of his life changed. If the disciples stole the body, then the conversion of the apostle Paul must be explained away. The resurrection accounts were hallucinations.


  1. Le Rouge et le Noir: Die Beziehung zwischen Julien und Mathilde (German Edition);
  2. About Truth That Changes Lives.
  3. The Professor at the Breakfast Table: “Death tugs at my ear and says, Live. I am coming.”.
  4. Don Stewart :: How Important Is the Resurrection to Christianity?;

The apostles so wanted Jesus to be raised from the dead that they convinced themselves it had actually happened. This view does not fit the evidence: In particular, the theory is hard-pressed to explain people claiming to see the resurrected Jesus Christ. Again, the changed life of the apostle Paul discredits this interpretation. Is there a view of the resurrection that fits all the facts? The obvious answer is yes. It is the view recorded by eyewitness testimony—the view that Jesus Christ bodily rose from the dead. This view is the very heart of the gospel; it is the view that we have already seen in 1 Corinthians Now, brothers, I want to remind you of the gospel I preached to you, which you received and on which you have taken your stand.

By this gospel you are saved, if you hold firmly to the word I preached to you. Otherwise, you have believed in vain. For what I received I passed on to you as of first importance: After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep.

Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also 1 Corinthians The resurrection of Jesus Christ is an historical fact. It is backed up by prophetic prediction, eye witness testimony, physical evidence and personal experience. It is the only conclusion that fits the evidence.

Brian G. Hedges

It is the resurrection of Jesus that validates His claim to be God and His assertion to be able to forgive our sins and give us eternal life. Consider the follow Scriptures: Jesus Christ our Lord. He who believes in me will live, even though he dies; 26 and whoever lives and believes in me will never die. When we choose to believe in Him and confess Him as our Lord, the Bible promises that our sins are forgiven and we receive the gift of eternal life.

Can you think of any intelligent reason not to repent and put your faith in Jesus Christ? To be indifferent to the evidence is to be intellectually dishonest and to be without excuse before God.

What are the proofs for the resurrection of Jesus?

To trust in the evidence and believe in Jesus Christ is to receive the forgiveness of your sins and the gift of eternal life. God created us to know Him but sin robs us of a full and satisfying life. He literally satisfies our thirsty souls and fills our hungry hearts with what is good. If you would like to receive Jesus Christ right now, let me suggest you follow the direction of Romans I believe you died for my sins and rose again from the dead.

Please forgive my sins, come into my life and be my Lord. I repent of my sins and I turn to you to take control of my own life. I receive you as my Savior and Lord. Thank you for hearing my prayer. Thank you for forgiving my sins and giving me the gift of eternal life. The hope of the gospel is that Jesus Christ is alive and that He gives eternal life to all who believe in Him.

If He did not come back from the dead then His ministry would have ended in defeat. Finally, it is important to His message. The centrality of the Christian message is that Jesus died and then came back from the dead. If He did not come back from the dead then there is no Christianity. Consequently we see that the resurrection of Jesus Christ is absolutely crucial to the Christian faith. Since the text and audio content provided by BLB represent a range of evangelical traditions, all of the ideas and principles conveyed in the resource materials are not necessarily affirmed, in total, by this ministry.

Blue Letter Bible study tools make reading, searching and studying the Bible easy and rewarding. Individual instructors or editors may still require the use of URLs. Keep me logged in! Did you forget your password? Why won't my login from the old site work? Usernames should only contain letters, numbers, dots, dashes, or underscores. Passwords should have at least 6 characters.

Your partnership makes all we do possible.


  • Resurrection of Jesus - Wikipedia!
  • Resurrection of Jesus;
  • Solo quello che vuoi tu - racconti erotici (Italian Edition)!
  • Would you prayerfully consider a gift of support today? Our website uses cookies to store user preferences. By proceeding, you consent to our cookie usage. Follow the Blue Letter Bible on: Or subscribe to our Newsletter: No Delimiter — None — Jhn 1: Square — [Jhn 1: Parens — Jhn 1: Help Video Tutorials 1. Essentials - The Bible 3. Essentials - Word Searching 4. Help Quick Nav Advanced Options. Old Testament New Testament.

    Search Results in Other Versions. Advanced Options Exact Match. En dash not Hyphen. Subscribe to our Newsletter. Daily Bible Reading Plans x. Recently Popular Pages x. Spurgeon's Morning and Evening O. Recently Popular Media x. Ezekiel Bob Davis Matthew How Important Is the Resurrection to Christianity? The apostles proclaimed Jesus' resurrection. Yet there were many Jews who were converted to Him. This includes a number of priests who believed in Jesus. Notice how clearly Paul stated the matter - no resurrection, no Christianity. Christian preaching is empty and so in anyone's faith because the object of the faith, Christ, is not whom He said He was.

    Newsletters Facebook Twitter Donate Contact. Blue Letter Bible is a c 3 nonprofit organization. Cite this page MLA format. Share this page using one of these tools: Or email this page to a friend: You must be logged in to send email. To James 1 Cor. To the twelve at the ascension Acts 1: The disciples had enough trouble believing that Christ would die and then be raised, and would never have even conceived of the idea of the Messiah having a different body. It is virtually inconceivable that early Christians fabricated such a story, which even today sounds like science fiction to many doubters.

    Modern scholars and historians admit that there is strong evidence of his bodily resurrection. Almost no New Testament scholar today denies that Jesus appeared to a number of his followers after his death. Some scholars interpret these as subjective hallucinations or objective visions granted by God which were not visions of a physical being. But no one denies that the believers had some sort of experience. The skeptical New Testament scholar Norman Perrin admitted: I know of no one fact in the history of mankind which is proved by better, fuller evidence of every sort, to the understanding of a fair enquirer, than the great sign which God hath given us that Christ died, and rose again from the dead.

    Simon Greenleaf is one of the most highly regarded legal minds ever seen in America. He was an expert on the laws of evidence, and the founder of the Harvard Law School. He analyzed the accounts in the Four Gospels of the resurrection of Christ in terms of their validity as objective testimonial evidence, and concluded:.

    It was therefore impossible that they could have persisted in affirming the truths they had narrated, had not Jesus actually risen from the dead, and had they not known this fact as certainly as they knew any other fact. Those who first published the story that Jesus had risen from the dead believed it to be a fact.

    3 Reasons the Resurrection Matters

    They rested their faith not only on the fact of the empty tomb, but on the fact that they themselves had seen Jesus alive after his burial. He was seen not once or twice, but at least ten recorded times; and not just one at a time, but in groups of two, seven, ten, eleven, and five hundred. The first-century believers preached and acted with conviction about the truth of his resurrection, many of them even dying because of their belief. If his friends had stolen the body to make it look like he had been resurrected, they would have known that they were believing a lie, and men do not become martyrs for what they know to be false.

    The unanimous testimony of eye-witnesses, who could not all have been deceived or deluded. Could it not have been an ecstatic vision? A fantasy of an excited imagination? None of these is at all probable, for different groups of people do not keep on seeing the same hallucination. Such a mystical and spiritualistic concept would not have satisfied the Hebraic mind of the disciples, however, who believed the dead to be dead until raised in a bodily, physical resurrection.

    With the exception of Joseph of Arimathea, the followers of Jesus did not believe that he would die and then be resurrected. They were not expecting the event, and when it happened they did not believe it at first. They did not believe it until they had to, when they were directly confronted by the risen Lord. One thing is certain: On the contrary, they somehow failed to anticipate it even after such an abundance of prophetic preparation for it, both from the Scriptures and from Christ.

    It took the strongest of evidences to convince them it had actually taken place. The idea of a resurrected Messiah was a hard sell to the Jews and absurd to the Greeks. The picture of Jesus was not in keeping with current conceptions of what the Messiah would be like a theocratic ruler who would deliver Israel from Gentile oppression and it would have been hard to convince others of its truth.

    The Greeks, with their doctrine of the immortality of the soul, thought the idea of a bodily resurrection absurd and unnecessary cp. If the disciples had invented an event or a doctrine around which to build a new religion, it would have been more in line with the standard expectations of the day. But in that case, weak and exhausted, encased in heavy grave wrappings, he could scarcely have moved, much less removed the heavy stone door and gotten out of the tomb.

    Furthermore, the Roman authorities had sealed the door, and even if he had been successful in moving the stone, the guards would have rearrested him and further humiliated him. Since there is no record of such an event, it must not have happened, because his enemies would have made much of such a bizarre happening. The very existence and growth of the Christian Church makes no sense if he was not raised.

    Some critics say that the resurrection was a later addition to the story of Christ, invented years later by the Church to glorify a dead hero. But it is known, from historical records outside Scripture, that the sect known as Christians came into existence in the reign of Tiberius, and that the thing that brought them into existence was their belief that Jesus had risen from the dead. The resurrection was not a later addition to the Christian faith, but the very cause and incentive for it. They rested their faith, not on historical records, but on what they had seen with their own eyes. The records were the result of their faith, not the cause of it.

    Had there been no resurrection, there would have been no New Testament, and no Christian Church. The disciples had nothing to gain by fabricating a story and starting a new religion. In light of this, they could never have sustained such unwavering motivation if they knew what they were preaching was a lie.

    3 Reasons the Resurrection Matters by Brian G. Hedges

    Religion had its rewards for them, but those rewards came from a sincere belief that what they were living for was true. If the empty tomb and resurrection was a fabrication, why did not at least one of the disciples break away from the rest and start his own version of Christianity? Or why did not at least one of them reveal the claim as a lie? The Temple authorities were willing to pay good money to anyone who would provide such information.